Fortigate Policy For Mac

In this example, you will add device definitions to your FortiGate using Media Access Control (MAC) addresses. These definitions are then used to determine which devices can access the wireless network. By using a for identification, you will also be able to assign a reserved IP for exclusive use by the device when it connects to the wireless network. Warning: Since MAC addresses can be easily spoofed, using MAC access control should not be considered a security measure. Find this recipe for other FortiOS versions: 5.2 1. Finding the MAC address of a device For Windows devices: Open the command prompt and type ipconfig /all This output displays configuration information for all of your network connections.

Look for the information about the wireless adapter and take note of the Physical Address. For Mac OS X devices: Open Terminal and type ifconfig en1 grep ether. Take note of the displayed MAC address. For iOS devices: Open Settings General and take note of the Wi-Fi Address. For Android devices: Open Settings More About Device Status and take note of the Wi-Fi MAC address.

Defining a device using its MAC address Go to User & Device Device Device Definitions and create a new device definition. Set MAC Address to the address of the device and set the other fields as required. In the example, a device definition is created for an iPhone with the MAC Address B0:34:95:C2:EF:D8. The new definition will now appear in your device list. Creating a device group Go to User & Device Device Device Groups and create a new group. Add the new device to the Members list. Reserving an IP address for the device Go to System Network Interfaces and edit the wireless.

Under Server, expand Advanced. Create a new entry in the MAC Reservation + Access Control list that reserves an within the DHCP range for the device’s MAC address. Creating a security policy for wireless traffic Go to Policy & Objects Policy and create a new policy.

Set Incoming Interface to your wireless interface, Source Device Type to the device group, and Outgoing Interface to the Internet-facing interface. Ensure that is turned on. Results Connect to the wireless network with a device that is a member of the device group. The device should be able to connect and allow Internet access. Connection attempts from a device that is not a group member will fail. Go to System FortiView All Sessions and view the results for now. Filter the results using the reserved Source IP (in the example, 10.10.80.20), to verify that it is being used exclusively by the wireless device.

download-attachments For further reading, check out in the.

Yes Si 2 rutas estaticas tipo default misma metrica y prioridad debe ser distinta para definir primario y secundario 0.0.0.0/0 apuntando a cada isp. Un link monitor o pin server apuntando a 1 ip por cada isp para monitorear estado up del isp 1 policy route que diga todo lo que venga por esta interface diagomos como source si su red interna es 192.168.1.0/24 pues la mitad seria 192.168.1.0/25 y como destino usas el isp que desees. 2 otro policy route si lo deseas por puerto o servicios Tambien leer en fortinet este tema lo mas que tiene son ejemplos. Tanr You can create some problems with this if you aren't careful and allow communications to come in through WAN1 that are responded to through WAN2. Once you narrow down your scenario and what solution you would like to use you might want to post it here to see if anybody else can point out possible problems before you go live with it.

Return Policy For Mac Books

Let me explain a bit more in case I wasn't clear. WAN1 has a static/public IP - I VPNs setup using this interface WAN2 doesn't (DCHP) Normally everything goes through WAN1. If WAN1 goes down evething goes through WAN2. What I want is to allow some specific devices on the network to ALWAYS use WAN2 (lets say everything goes through WAN1, but the device with the IP 10.0.0.150 will always go through WAN2). I read on a post from 2015 that it should be possible via a Policy Route. Create a policy based route by clicking on System Router Policy Route Create New Source Interface - Internal; Source Address:Test PC IP Destination Address - ANY(0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0); Outgoing Interface: Wan2; Gateway: 0.0.0.0; The problem is that in that part where it says Source Address:Test PC IP if I type the IP of the device (10.0.0.50) I get this error Invalid IP range.

So it doesn't save the changes. If I type 10.0.0.150/255.255.255.0 it accepts the changes, but when I look a the routing table instead of having 10.0.0.150/255.255.255.0 on the source address I get this 10.0.0.0/255.255.255.0. So I assume that would mean the Policy Route will apply to the whole Subnet instead of a specific device. Tanr You can have a policy route work with a source address that is a single IP, you just need to specify the appropriate subnet. For your case, just set src 10.0.0.150/255.255.255.255. I just did a quick test of this to make sure, and confirmed that the policy route correctly routes only the single IP I specify out the different wan port, leaving all the rest of the IPs in my 255.255.255.0 subnet going out the default wan port. I've got static IPs, but it should work the same.

Besides the Policy Route did you have to do anything else? I created the Policy Route, but I don't think its working because some devices are going through WAN2 when I haven't specified it on the Policy Route. Interfaces Right now I have the WAN1 interface (static IP) with the default distance (I guess 10 because when its static you cant see it) and the WAN2 interface (DHCP) with a distance of 20. Static Routes On the static routes I have 1 for WAN1 and 1 for WAN2 with the destination IP/Mask of 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0. On this part should both interfaces have the same Distance and Priority? Are you running 5.4.x or something else? This is a little different between versions.

I'm not sure what you mean by having a distance set on the actual interface. Do you mean what you see in the routing table? I'm assuming you are using static routing, not dynamic?

Regarding the static routes, you don't want them to both have the same distance and same priority or they will be considered ECMP (Equal Cost Multi Path) routes and the FortiGate will use both, balancing their use. What I believe you need for your default static routes is to specify the same distance for the default routes to WAN1 and WAN2, but different priorities, say priority 8 for WAN1 and priority 12 for WAN2. This will keep them both in the routing table, but always use the one with priority set to a lower value (which means higher priority). The route with lower priority (bigger value) will normally only be used if the interface for the higher priority route goes down.

Determining when interfaces have gone down is a whole different discussion. With your static routes set up this way (same distance but different priorities) you can then create a policy route which will force your specific source IPs to use the lower-priority route. The policy routing happens before static routing. Note that policy routes are examined sequentially, so if you have multiple ones, make sure your more specific ones are listed first. It would be helpful if you ran the following CLI commands after setting up the static and policy routes as discussed to verify their output matches what you expect. Get router info routing-table all diag ip route list show router policy You could post the output of those commands here but I'd recommend obfuscating the IPs before posting.

As an example, what I see with my own setup for the routing-table includes S. 0.0.0.0/0 10/0 via IP.11.IP.11, port1, 8/0 10/0 via IP.22.IP.22, port2, 12/0 Showing that I have two default routes, both with distance of 10, but with port1 having a priority of 8 and port2 having a priority of 12, so normally port1 would be used. My diag ip route list is kind of long, but in it you'll find: tab=254 vf=0 scope=0 type=1 proto=11 prio=8 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0-0.0.0.0/0 pref=0.0.0.0 gwy=IP.11.IP.11 dev=7(port1) tab=254 vf=0 scope=0 type=1 proto=11 prio=12 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0-0.0.0.0/0 pref=0.0.0.0 gwy=IP.22.IP.22 dev=8(port2) My show router policy includes the rule that routes an interface and subnet to port2: config router policy edit 1 set input-device 'intf-obfusc' set src 'IP.LOCAL.IP/255.255.255.0' set output-device 'port2' next.

Return Policy For Mac Cosmetics

Tanr Are you running 5.4.x or something else? This is a little different between versions. 5.2.4 (but I could update the firmware if its better/easier to deal with this sort of scenario). Tanr I'm not sure what you mean by having a distance set on the actual interface. Do you mean what you see in the routing table? I'm assuming you are using static routing, not dynamic?

Originally (before my last post) WAN1 had a static IP, but WAN2 had a dynamic IP. ISP from WAN2 doesn't give static IPs and its modem/router doesn't allow to be set to bridge mode. So yes, on WAN 2 at that point I was able to set a distance on the interface. I changed it to Manual and set a DMZ from the modem/router to WAN2 on the Forti. Now its working. Thanks for all your feedback.

Fortigate Policy By Mac

It helped out a lot. I have worked with Forti a lot, but mostly with single WAN connections (or dual WAN, but only for redundancy). And doing a lot of VPNs.

This is the first time I had to deal with this specific type of dual WAN setup.